What Is Foreign Nation-Building?
reinhardt’s journal identifies and pays a lot of attention to ”divides”.
Page Index:
- Bridging Another Industrial Divide
- The Foreign Investment Shell Game
- The Difference Between Building A Nation And Upgrading A Nation
- Tenth In The World In Broadband?
- The “Closed-Door” Task Force
- Economic & Industrial Treason
- Enron Tax-Shelters; How Do You Keep From Leaving A Paper Trail?
- Samuel Slater; Father Of American Manufactures
- Lots Of Things Changed After 9-11
- Voting matters
Bridging Another Industrial Divide
America’s workforce of the future is almost always located somewhere.. other than America.
It may seem ironic but the primary function of the United States Department of Commerce and the United States Department of Labor is to facilitate the movement of jobs from U.S. businesses to anywhere other.. than the United States.
The infrastructure in the foreign nations that government and business plans on outsourcing to is almost more important than infrastructure in the homeland.
Vice-President Gore may have invented the Internet but Global Crossing, Tyco, Enron, and a great number of other telecommunications and energy companies installed it.. overseas.
Every infrastructure and industrial advancement in the homeland has got to globalize its way to the globe’s cheaper labor-pools.
The global knowledge transfer and the expense for the transfer has to be planned behind closed-doors as the voters in the homeland have never and will never vote approvingly for the funding of the grand plan (the “big game”).
Why would a homeland laborer willingly pay to build another nation’s infrastructure if they were aware that the purpose of the project was to relocate their job there?
This is why closed-door government exists to centrally plan it and why enterprise corruption exists.. to pay for it.
You cannot outsource work to a nation that doesn’t have the infrastructure to support it.
During the Victorian Era the task of transferring industrial-age commercial and military technology and knowledge to friendly nations and enemy nations all over the world was handled by one gigantic German inbred family structure.
Readying a foreign nation for outsourcing of industry or labor has never been sell-able. The homeland labor force won’t buy it, won’t vote for it, and won’t knowingly pay for it.
Historical pattern of an industrial revolution (in order):
- appearance of a disruptive and revolutionary utility, technology, science, or discovery (minerals)
- measurement of its effect on wages
- identification of out-sourceable nations
- closed-door task force convened
- war started (perfect citizens galvanized)
- securities regulation lifted
- quiet waivers and exemptions from previous white-collar crime legislation
- corporations re-located off-shore
- book-cooking commences
- moral/ethical diversion(s)
- foreign infrastructure upgrade
- foreign infrastructure goes “online”
- book-cookers quietly confess
- book-cookers withdraw holdings
- rumors spread of inappropriate accounting methods
- share value debased
- book cookers publicly confess
- public receives invoice
- another war turns attention from book-cooking to life’s more important issues (life & limb, individual safety, sheer survival from enemy du jour)
In campaign 2004 President Bush stated the basic position of both candidates when he declared “We rank 10th amongst the industrialized world in broadband technology and its availability. That is not good enough for America. Tenth is ten spots too low as far as I’m concerned.”
And on election day 2004.. while voters were dutifully carrying out their obligation in the system of democracy.. Tyco announced that it will sell its global fiber-optic network to India’s Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. for $130 million.
The cost of the global fiber-optic network to Tyco was.. $3.5 billion.
Minor correction: The fiber-optic network didn’t cost Tyco a dime. The fiber-optic network was bought and paid for by Tyco’s unwitting outside shareholders.
Don’t say this too loudly in the land of freedom of speech but the fiber-optic network gifted to India’s billionaire industrialists was bought and paid for by.. crony capitalism.
Here is another reason why judges tell jurors to disregard comparisons between fraud at energy companies and fraud at telecommunications companies.
Koslowski, Schwartz, Rudman, & Belnick made telecommunications cheap.. in India.
Kenneth Lay & Enron made electricity cheap.. in India while Kenneth Lay & Enron made energy disappear.. in California.
This is what is called:
- a free foreign energy infrastructure upgrade
- a free foreign transport upgrade
- a free foreign telecommunications system upgrade
- “bridging another divide”
As soon as the big bridge project is finished it is the public that gets the actual invoice.
The following is a big bridge project and a technology-transfer and a foreign-nation upgrade to a convenient enemy nation that will be paid for by a market crash around 2014.
Westinghouse To Build Four Nuclear Reactors For China
http://www.enterprisecorruption.com/?page_id=88
Banks pretend to finance the bridge project at the start and then the public gets the bill.
This has been the case with every “next-big-thing” throughout history.
The invoice almost always comes in the form of war.
Bought and paid for by something called ”capitalism”.
Capitalism builds foreign nations with outside investor financing.
Capitalism is a piggy-bank that gets cracked open every 5 to 10 years to pay for the expenses of globalization.
Capitalism is one of many ways to build infrastructure.. in other countries.. free of cost to the nation or nations that receive the upgrade.
Pretending that India was ever expected to pay its Enron energy bills was a top priority of the Clinton Administration.
Why would India’s leaders believe for a second that India would ever have to pay two admittedly fraudulent corporations (not including the 60 other admittedly fraudulent energy corporations also upgrading the Indian infrastructure) for India’s infrastructure projects?
The Difference Between Building A Nation And Upgrading A Nation
The act of “Bridging” “the” digital divide makes it seem like the divide only needed to be bridged.. and only bridged once.
Just like a computer and just like computer virus software the world’s digital divide will require constant upgrading and this is why I refer to foreign nation building as a foreign nation upgrade.
Each successive industrial revolution is actually an upgrade to advance the infrastructure that was already in existence at the foreign nation in question.
Therefore upgrading of foreign nations is imminent and therefore enterprise corruption is imminent.
reinhardt’s journal follows.. global infrastructure upgrades.
Economic & Industrial Treason; Lots Of Things Changed After 9-11
Lots of things changed after the first bombing of the World Trade Center. For instance, Bombay became.. Mumbai.
Lots of things changed after the second attack on the World Trade Center. For instance, homeland jobs fled to.. Mumbai.
The “axis of evil” is a Latin banking term for “overdue for a free infrastructure upgrade” which will be carried out by cost-effective war-labor and will as usual be paid for by enterprise corruption.
It may seem somewhat unpatriotic but businessmen with “single-minded” pursuits of profit cook the books during wars too.
One of the main reasons enterprise corruption is too confusing for jurors is because industrial and economic treason are very confusing and covering them both up is a full-time obsession with those charged to defend the behavior.
In fact the act of uncovering economic and industrial treason and making it public is in itself treason and bringing it out into the open it up is considered to to be sedition.
No expectation of payment for your foreign nation upgrade = treason.
The beauty of “foreign investment” (especially with a threatening nation) is that the foreign nation can pretend to decide to pay for the project (creating a phony bubble) and then the foreign nation can pretend not to pay (creating the phony debasement opportunity) then the blame is placed on the fact that the foreign nation is “foreign” or maybe the foreign nation is the wrong religion, or, the wrong style of government, or, in many cases just being in a different hemisphere (east versus west) is the proclaimed cause of the problem.
Example: When the foreign infrastructure projects begin in China the nation is referred to as “the republic of China”. When the bill comes due and the homeland investors pay the invoice for China’s infrastructure upgrade the nation of China changes names and becomes referred to (once again) as “Communist China”.
The Times Of UK published on September 08 2007: “China’s Cyber-Army Is Preparing To March On America”.
Oh my goodness.. Russian made rifles!
China’s “cyber-army” wouldn’t exist without the free technical handouts provided by Lucent, Cisco Systems, Microsoft, and IBM (Lenovo).
This is called upgrading the enemy for free.. for the next war.
This love-hate relationship is another example of how “change” works in the foreign nation-building game.
This way the homeland labor force gets the opportunity to go to war with a country that was previously advertised as a “most favorable nation”.
Samuel Slater; Father Of American Manufactures
Following the Constitutional Convention of 1787, British patent law could be avoided as easily as “memorizing the patented design in one’s head”.
In 1789, just 2 years after “severing all ties” with England, Samuel Slater circumvented the British ban on exporting textile machines by “committing every detail of their design to memory and then sneaking out of the country disguised as a farm laborer”.
This is a technology transfer, this is outsourcing, this is globalization, and this is industrial and economic treason.. so Andrew Jackson honored the industrial pirate as the “Father of American Manufactures” and it starts to shed some light on the commercial, industrial, and financial definition of the word.. “father”.
So, in the 1790s the farm laborers in England like the kind Samuel Slater was disguised as are now competing with the wages of U.S. slaves and child labor using pirated industrial technology. And that just about sums up how the game between labor and management really works.
Wilberforce should have made a motion to bring back Slater’s pirated textile mill.
Turns out.. Samuel Slater didn’t really have to disguise himself as a farm laborer. He could have just blamed the foreign-enemy technology-transfer on ”liberal politics” like British Prime Minister Clement Attlee in 1946 as he transferred the Rolls-Royce jet-engine to Russia for a successful kick-off.. of the Cold-War.
Even Winston Churchill didn’t know Soviet Russian MiG fighter-jets were propelled by British Rolls-Royce jet-engines.
In fact here is a list of notable politicians, statesmen, world-leaders and other sacred-cows that like Winston Churchill.. also didn’t know Soviet Bloc MiG fighter-jets were powered by British Rolls-Royce jet-engines.
- Anyone who panicked over Sputnik
- Dr. Strangelove
- Osama bin Laden’s dad
- the AFL-CIO
- Rosa Parks
- West-Germany
- William F. Buckley
- Martin Luther King
- Newt Gingrich
- Dwight Eisenhower
- General Electric
- Ronald Reagan
- George H.W. Bush
- President Johnson
- Czechoslovakia
- Harry Truman
- Queen Elizabeth II
- Greece
- Turkey
- George Meany
- Walter Ruether
- James Bond
- Mother Theresa
- Dr. Seuss
- Joseph McCarthy
- The Aspen Institute
- Admiral Forestall
- NATO
- Belgium
- Canada
- France
- Iceland
- Italy
- Luxembourg
- The Netherlands
- Norway
- Portugal
- The United Kingdom
- George Orwell
- Whittaker Chambers
- Dewey (as if voting matters)
- The Roswell, New Mexico Sherriff’s Department
- George Keenan
- Afghanistan
- Cuba
- North Korea
- China
- North Vietnam
- South Vietnam
- The CIA (doubtful)
- The House Un-American Affairs Committee
- The Screen-Actor’s Guild
- Friedrich von Hayek
- Arthur Anderson
- Henry Wallace
- Stalin
- Ho Chi Minh
- Franklin D. Roosevelt
- Adolph Hitler
- The Bank of England
- Normandy’s D-Day Invaders
Technology and labor-pool transfers are considered to be very entrepreneurial.
Even after Samuel Slater’s textile machinery patent theft Britain is still not paying attention to industrial treasonists.
In 1800 during another British suspension of the writ of Habeas Corpus, Lieven Bauwens stole a spinning “mule-jenny” machine from England. He had it dismantled and smuggled out in a cargo of coffee. This enabled the textile industry in Ghent, Belgium to greatly expand.
Piracy of industrial technology allows industries to greatly expand.
Is planned piracy still considered piracy or are the patent offices just pretending to fail?
Notice how those sticky-fingered Brits are always stealing some newly-invented labor-saving device and installing it where cheaper labor is? Britain is giving away its textile inventions to its enemies while at the same time it is pretending to eliminate slavery and child-labor.
To punish Bauwens for his technology theft (globalism) Britain sentenced Bauwens to death.. after he already died.
Slater and Bauwens knew a thing or two about the reality of “The Wealth Of Nations”.
Juror and investor tip: There was a textile machinery divide and when there is a divide to be bridged.. the books will be cooked, the technology will be transferred (even between so-called enemies) and when a juror hears the words: “greatest accounting fraud ever” or “era of greed” followed by “because its war!” the juror can be guaranteed that some foreign-nation somewhere just received a free infrastructure upgrade.
reinhardt’s journal follows.. labor-pool transfers.
Voting matters
A two-party government works well with respect to foreign nation-building. The foreign nation gets built under the majority of one party. The upgrade is completed. The other party pretends it was wrong to do. But the foreign nation upgrade still happens anyway.
At the start of the cold-war (Fun With The Cold War) the soviets got free Rolls-Royce engines for their jet-fighters because a British statesman was a liberal. The political “division” game works very well if one’s intent is to build foreign-nations (even evil scary ones). This was a case where democracy itself aided in the transfer of technology to an enemy nation.
Most presidents can’t seem to stop foreign nation-building even after they are through being the president.
continue the tour: What Is.. “The Enterprise”?
5 Comments
Jump to comment form | comments rss [?]